Login

Michael Burry's AI Bets: What's the Big Short Seeing?

Polkadotedge 2025-11-04 Total views: 3, Total comments: 0 michael burry

Dr. Thorne's Take: Burry's Bets Don't Scare Me – AI's Revolution is Unstoppable

Okay, let's talk about Michael Burry. The guy who called the 2008 crash, the legend immortalized in "The Big Short." He's back in the news, and this time, he's betting against AI. Puts on Nvidia, puts on Palantir – big, bold moves that have the financial world buzzing. He's even dusted off his Twitter account (now X, I guess), posting cryptic messages about bubbles and "the only winning move is not to play."

Now, I respect Burry immensely. He's a brilliant investor, a true contrarian thinker. But here's the thing: sometimes, even the smartest people can miss the forest for the trees. And when it comes to AI, I think he's missing a massive forest.

Why Burry's Bearishness Doesn't Tell the Whole Story

The reports are all over the place, painting a picture of Burry as the Cassandra of AI, warning us of impending doom. One article shouts, "Michael Burry Is Super-Bearish On Palantir — With 5 Million Puts!" Another highlights his return to X with a Star Wars reference, implying we're being blinded by Jedi mind tricks when we should be seeing a bubble. He's even changed his profile name to "Cassandra Unchained," a priestess from Greek mythology cursed to make accurate prophecies but never to be believed.

But let's dig a little deeper, shall we? Burry's not just betting against AI companies; he's also making some very interesting moves elsewhere. He's increased his stake in Lululemon, opened new positions in Molina Healthcare and SLM Corp, and bought calls on Halliburton and Pfizer. So, what does this tell us? It suggests he's anticipating a shift in the market, perhaps a rotation out of tech and into more traditional sectors. Maybe he thinks the AI hype has driven valuations to unsustainable levels, and a correction is inevitable.

And you know what? He might be right about a short-term correction. Markets are cyclical, and even the most revolutionary technologies can experience pullbacks. But to extrapolate that into a full-blown "AI bubble" that's about to burst? I think that's where he's missing the bigger picture.

Michael Burry's AI Bets: What's the Big Short Seeing?

Here's why: AI isn't just another tech fad. It's not like the dot-com bubble, where companies with no real business model were trading at astronomical valuations. AI is a fundamental shift in how we create, innovate, and solve problems. It's like the invention of the printing press, but instead of democratizing information, it's democratizing intelligence. The implications are staggering – and frankly, a little overwhelming.

What does this mean for us? Well, imagine personalized medicine tailored to your unique genetic makeup, AI-powered education that adapts to your individual learning style, or sustainable energy solutions designed by algorithms that can optimize energy grids with mind-boggling efficiency. The speed of this is just staggering—it means the gap between today and tomorrow is closing faster than we can even comprehend.

And yes, there are risks. Ethical considerations around bias, job displacement, and the potential for misuse are very real. We need to be thoughtful and responsible in how we develop and deploy these technologies. But to shy away from AI altogether, to "not play the game," as Burry suggests, would be a colossal mistake. It would be like turning our backs on the industrial revolution or refusing to explore the internet.

I saw a comment on a Reddit thread the other day that really resonated with me. Someone wrote, "AI is a tool, and like any tool, it can be used for good or for evil. It's up to us to make sure it's used for good." And I think that's the key. We can't let fear paralyze us. We need to embrace the potential of AI while also mitigating its risks.

What I want to know is if Burry's bearishness stems from a genuine concern about a bubble or a deeper skepticism about the technology itself? Is he underestimating the transformative power of AI? And if so, what are the specific risks he sees that others aren't acknowledging?

This Isn't a Bubble; It's a New Reality

I'm not saying AI is a guaranteed success story. There will be challenges, setbacks, and even failures along the way. But I am saying that AI is here to stay. It's not a fleeting trend; it's a fundamental shift in the technological landscape. And those who are willing to embrace it, to learn from it, and to build with it will be the ones who shape the future. It is a tool, and like any tool, it can be used for good or for evil. It's up to us to make sure it's used for good.

Don't miss