So, YouTube TV subscribers are getting screwed because Disney and Google can't play nice? Color me shocked. Actually, no, I'm not shocked. This is the media landscape in 2025. It's all about squeezing every last drop of cash out of consumers.
The news is that Disney-owned channels like ABC, ESPN, FX, and Nat Geo are gone from YouTube TV thanks to a "contract dispute." What a load of corporate BS. Let's be real: it's about money. Always is. They're fighting over pennies while we're left staring at a blank screen on Monday Night Football night.
And the "solution" they offer? Oh, just subscribe to another streaming service. Fubo, Sling, ESPN Unlimited… it's a goddamn buffet of subscriptions, each one nickel-and-diming you for content you already thought you were paying for. It's like they're running a protection racket: "Nice streaming setup you got there. Shame if something were to happen to it… unless you pay up."
Fubo's offering a free trial and $30 off? Sling's got short-term passes? ESPN Unlimited wants $30 a month for just ESPN? Give me a break. It's like putting a band-aid on a severed limb. These aren't solutions; they're temporary fixes designed to get you hooked on yet another platform. They expect us to believe this nonsense, and honestly...
And what about Fubo merging with Hulu + Live TV? Okay, that's interesting. It's supposed to create the sixth-largest Pay TV service in the U.S. serving close to 6 million subscribers across North America. But does that mean better service or just a bigger, more monolithic entity to screw us over? I'm betting on the latter.
Fubo's stock went up after reporting earnings. Revenue down a bit, but they beat expectations. Whoop-dee-doo. Why Is FuboTV Stock Gaining Monday? - FuboTV (NYSE:FUBO) They're still playing the same game, just with slightly different numbers.
Oh, and by the way, here's what you're missing on YouTube TV: ABC, the whole ESPN suite, FX, Nat Geo, Disney Channel… basically, half the channels you actually watch. So what are we supposed to do? Just sit around twiddling our thumbs waiting for these corporate giants to kiss and make up? Not likely.
Maybe I'm being too harsh. Maybe these companies are just trying to survive in a brutal market. Maybe… nah, who am I kidding? They're greedy. Plain and simple. They don't care about the viewers. They care about the bottom line.
Speaking of not caring, I saw a squirrel in my backyard the other day burying a nut. It reminded me that I need to winterize my gutters and offcourse, I have to pay for that too. Everything's a subscription these days, even homeownership.
So, what's the answer? Do we all just go back to pirating content? Is that where we're headed? Because honestly, it's starting to look like the only viable option. If these companies are going to treat us like ATMs, why should we play by their rules?
But then again, piracy is a hassle. The quality is often crap, and you're always risking viruses. And it's illegal, technically. But is it really any more unethical than what these streaming services are doing? I'm not so sure.
It's all a rigged game. They'll keep shuffling the deck, offering "deals" and "bundles" and "free trials," but in the end, we're always going to be the ones paying the price. So, screw it. I'm going back to reading books. At least those don't require a monthly subscription… yet.
beta technologies: what we know
2025-11-05
